↓ Skip to main content

Biosafety Practices When Working with Bats: A Guide to Field Research Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biosafety, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biosafety Practices When Working with Bats: A Guide to Field Research Considerations
Published in
Applied Biosafety, September 2022
DOI 10.1089/apb.2022.0019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvaro Aguilar-Setién, Nidia Aréchiga-Ceballos, Gary A. Balsamo, Amy J. Behrman, Hannah K. Frank, Gary R. Fujimoto, Elizabeth Gilman Duane, Thomas Warner Hudson, Shelley M. Jones, Luis A. Ochoa Carrera, Gregory L. Powell, Carrie A. Smith, Joni Triantis Van Sickle, Susan E. Vleck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 13 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 13 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,574,283
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biosafety
#56
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,493
of 438,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biosafety
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.