You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of NFIB and CYP1A variants on clozapine serum concentration—A retrospective naturalistic cohort study on 526 patients with known smoking habits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cts.13422 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hasan Çağın Lenk, Robert Løvsletten Smith, Kevin S. O'Connell, Marin M. Jukić, Marianne Kristiansen Kringen, Ole A. Andreassen, Magnus Ingelman‐Sundberg, Espen Molden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,147,804
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#305
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,274
of 445,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.