You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
講義の時間——ベルクソンのコレージュ・ド・フランス講義録を読む
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revue de Philosophie Francaise, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.51086/sfjp.27.0_3 |
| Authors |
藤田 尚志 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,176,559
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Revue de Philosophie Francaise
#2
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,525
of 444,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revue de Philosophie Francaise
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.