↓ Skip to main content

Studies on the Salivary Glands of the Rice Plant Leafhoppers

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1971
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studies on the Salivary Glands of the Rice Plant Leafhoppers
Published in
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1971
DOI 10.1303/jjaez.15.132
Authors

Kazushige SOGAWA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,951,048
of 23,482,849 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#138
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,677
of 16,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,482,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.