The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
甲状腺穿刺材料を利用した補助診断
|
---|---|
Published in |
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.11226/jaesjsts.37.1_32 |
Authors |
廣川 満良, 鈴木 彩菜, 川木 裕子, 工藤 工, 木原 実, 宮 章博, 宮内 昭 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#72
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,725
of 422,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them