↓ Skip to main content

Anti–Cholestatic Therapy with Obeticholic Acid Improves Short-Term Memory in Bile Duct–Ligated Mice

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 6,013)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti–Cholestatic Therapy with Obeticholic Acid Improves Short-Term Memory in Bile Duct–Ligated Mice
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, October 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy M V Gee, Ben Barron-Millar, Jack Leslie, Claire Richardson, Marco Y W Zaki, Saimir Luli, Rachel A Burgoyne, Rainie I T Cameron, Graham R Smith, John G Brain, Barbara Innes, Laura Jopson, Jessica K Dyson, Katherine R C McKay, Alexandros Pechlivanis, Elaine Holmes, Rolando Berlinguer-Palmini, Stella Victorelli, George F Mells, Richard N Sandford, Jeremy Palmer, John A Kirby, Christos Kiourtis, Joao Mokochinski, Zoe Hall, Thomas G Bird, Lee A Borthwick, Christopher M Morris, Peter S Hanson, Diana Jurk, Elizabeth A Stoll, Fiona E N LeBeau, David E J Jones, Fiona Oakley

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#200,456
of 26,362,953 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#24
of 6,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,610
of 444,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.