↓ Skip to main content

グラフェン電界効果トランジスタを基盤としたバイオセンサ

Overview of attention for article published in Vacuum and Surface Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
グラフェン電界効果トランジスタを基盤としたバイオセンサ
Published in
Vacuum and Surface Science, July 2020
DOI 10.1380/vss.63.358
Authors

Shota USHIBA, Naruto MIYAKAWA, Tsuyoshi OKINO, Ayumi SHINAGAWA, Yuka OKA, Masahiko KIMURA, Takao ONO, Yasushi KANAI, Koichi INOUE, Kazuhiko MATSUMOTO

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Vacuum and Surface Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,097
of 401,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vacuum and Surface Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them