The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using active source seismology to image the Palos Verdes Fault damage zone as a function of distance, depth, and geology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117871 |
Authors |
Travis Alongi, Emily E. Brodsky, Jared Kluesner, Daniel Brothers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 22% |
Peru | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 29% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,703,956
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#1,038
of 5,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,406
of 502,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#23
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.