You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential Impact of Renal Function on the Diagnostic Performance of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio in Patients With Renal Dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Reports, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circrep.cr-22-0069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hirofumi Ohashi, Tomoaki Nawano, Hiroaki Takashima, Hirohiko Ando, Reiji Goto, Akihiro Suzuki, Shinichiro Sakurai, Wataru Suzuki, Yusuke Nakano, Hiroaki Sawada, Masanobu Fujimoto, Koshiro Sakai, Yasushi Suzuki, Katsuhisa Waseda, Tetsuya Amano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,724,105
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Reports
#45
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,741
of 429,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.