The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JCS 2021 Guideline on the Clinical Application of Echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nobuyuki Ohte, Tomoko Ishizu, Chisato Izumi, Hiroshi Itoh, Shiro Iwanaga, Hiroyuki Okura, Yutaka Otsuji, Yasushi Sakata, Toshihiko Shibata, Toshiro Shinke, Yoshihiro Seo, Masao Daimon, Masaaki Takeuchi, Kazuaki Tanabe, Satoshi Nakatani, Masaki Nii, Kazuhiro Nishigami, Takeshi Hozumi, Satoshi Yasukochi, Hirotsugu Yamada, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Masaki Izumo, Katsuji Inoue, Hiroyuki Iwano, Atsushi Okada, Akihisa Kataoka, Shuichiro Kaji, Kenya Kusunose, Akiko Goda, Yasuharu Takeda, Hidekazu Tanaka, Kaoru Dohi, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi, Hidekatsu Fukuta, Satoshi Yamada, Nozomi Watanabe, Makoto Akaishi, Takashi Akasaka, Takeshi Kimura, Masami Kosuge, Tohru Masuyama, on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,317,706
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#140
of 2,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,121
of 443,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.