You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scaling of Activity Space in Marine Organisms across Latitudinal Gradients.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Naturalist, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1086/723405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinay Udyawer, Charlie Huveneers, Fabrice Jaine, Russell C Babcock, Stephanie Brodie, Marie-Jeanne Buscot, Hamish A Campbell, Robert G Harcourt, Xavier Hoenner, Elodie J I Lédée, Colin A Simpfendorfer, Matthew D Taylor, Asia Armstrong, Adam Barnett, Culum Brown, Barry Bruce, Paul A Butcher, Gwenael Cadiou, Lydie I E Couturier, Leanne Currey-Randall, Michael Drew, Christine L Dudgeon, Ross G Dwyer, Mario Espinoza, Luciana C Ferreira, Anthony Fowler, David Harasti, Alastair R Harborne, Nathan A Knott, Kate Lee, Matt Lloyd, Michael Lowry, Teagan Marzullo, Jordan Matley, Jaime D McAllister, Rory McAuley, Frazer McGregor, Mark Meekan, Kade Mills, Bradley M Norman, Beverly Oh, Nicholas L Payne, Vic Peddemors, Toby Piddocke, Richard D Pillans, Richard D Reina, Paul Rogers, Jayson M Semmens, Amy Smoothey, Conrad W Speed, Dylan van der Meulen, Michelle R Heupel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 27 | 21% |
| United States | 17 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 60% |
| Scientists | 50 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#589,438
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#109
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,382
of 430,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.