↓ Skip to main content

Sudden cardiac death in the young: A consensus statement on recommended practices for cardiac examination by pathologists from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Pathology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sudden cardiac death in the young: A consensus statement on recommended practices for cardiac examination by pathologists from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology
Published in
Cardiovascular Pathology, November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.carpath.2022.107497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen L Kelly, Peter T Lin, Cristina Basso, Melanie Bois, L Maximilian Buja, Stephen D Cohle, Giulia d'Amati, Emily Duncanson, John T Fallon, Dennis Firchau, Gregory Fishbein, Carla Giordano, Charles Leduc, Silvio H Litovsky, Shannon Mackey-Bojack, Joseph J Maleszewski, Katarzyna Michaud, Robert F Padera, Stavroula A Papadodima, Sarah Parsons, Stanley J Radio, Stefania Rizzo, Susan J Roe, Maria Romero, Mary N Sheppard, James R Stone, Carmela D Tan, Gaetano Thiene, Allard C van der Wal, John P Veinot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 19 66%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,253,285
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Pathology
#95
of 625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,975
of 435,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Pathology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.