↓ Skip to main content

Longevity in Wild Wolves

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalogy, February 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longevity in Wild Wolves
Published in
Journal of Mammalogy, February 1988
DOI 10.2307/1381776
Authors

L. David Mech

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 10%
Hungary 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Other 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 50%
Environmental Science 5 25%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2008.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#1,205
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,616
of 12,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.