The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
秋季の太平洋側北極海における Limacina helicina 幼生の鉛直分布
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.24763/bpsj.69.1_11 |
| Authors |
佐藤 直, 徳弘 航季, 松野 孝平 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan
#12
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,229
of 452,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.