↓ Skip to main content

大規模土砂移動発生履歴の高精度復元に向けた埋没樹木の年代測定 -歴史時代に中部山岳地域で発生した事例-

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大規模土砂移動発生履歴の高精度復元に向けた埋没樹木の年代測定 -歴史時代に中部山岳地域で発生した事例-
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, January 2022
DOI 10.11475/sabo.73.5_3
Authors

山田 隆二, 木村 誇, 苅谷 愛彦, 佐野 雅規, 對馬 あかね, 李 貞, 中塚 武, 國分(齋藤) 陽子, 井上 公夫

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,580,699
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering
#72
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,765
of 522,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.