The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Causes, Responses, and Implications of Anthropogenic versus Natural Flow Intermittence in River Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biac098 |
| Authors |
Thibault Datry, Amélie Truchy, Julian D Olden, Michelle H Busch, Rachel Stubbington, Walter K Dodds, Sam Zipper, Songyan Yu, Mathis L Messager, Jonathan D Tonkin, Kendra E Kaiser, John C Hammond, Eric K Moody, Ryan M Burrows, Romain Sarremejane, Amanda G DelVecchia, Megan L Fork, Chelsea J Little, Richard H Walker, Annika W Walters, Daniel Allen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 11 | 16% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 77% |
| Scientists | 15 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#666,651
of 26,172,861 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#266
of 2,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,418
of 493,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,172,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.