The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
被災患者動線シミュレーションによる緊急医療救護所の建築計画的研究 その 2:東京湾北部地震の被災患者数予測における災害拠点病院の面積規模に基づく考察
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3130/aija.87.1124 |
| Authors |
Kana EGAWA, Tokuhiro KOJIMA, Yuu TSUBOTA, Wen-Jing CHIANG, Shigeru ANDO, Tetsuro YAMASHITA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,275,579
of 26,489,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#327
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,253
of 445,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,489,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.