↓ Skip to main content

新規な記号コミュニケーションシステムの 形成に及ぼす自閉傾向の影響

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
新規な記号コミュニケーションシステムの 形成に及ぼす自閉傾向の影響
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, December 2022
DOI 10.11225/cs.2022.024
Authors

森田 純哉, 小嶋 暁, 金野 武司, 橋本 敬

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#21,316,883
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#309
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,735
of 492,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.