↓ Skip to main content

ジュニア競技者の普及・育成・強化システムを考える −日本陸連東京オリンピックプロジェクトの取り組み−

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ジュニア競技者の普及・育成・強化システムを考える −日本陸連東京オリンピックプロジェクトの取り組み−
Published in
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.7600/jspfsm.65.121
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,303,998
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#165
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,064
of 402,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.