The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Challenges and Changes of Secondary Information Databases Overseas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1241/johokanri.50.745 |
Authors |
Soichi TOKIZANE, WADA Mitsutoshi |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 2 | 50% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 2 | 50% |
Psychology | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#343
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,160
of 170,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.