The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing translocated beavers used as passive restoration tools to resident beavers in degraded desert rivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acv.12846 |
| Authors |
E. Doden, P. Budy, M. Conner, J. K. Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,696,144
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#268
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,827
of 477,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.