The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating quality improvement at scale: A pilot study on routine reporting for executive board governance in a UK National Health Service organisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evaluation & Program Planning, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kia-Chong Chua, Claire Henderson, Barbara Grey, Michael Holland, Nick Sevdalis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,192,296
of 26,242,030 outputs
Outputs from Evaluation & Program Planning
#61
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,813
of 491,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evaluation & Program Planning
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,242,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.