The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
絶滅危惧種カゼトゲタナゴの環境DNA分析を用いた検出法の確立
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.34583/ichthy.28.0_1 |
| Authors |
百冨 修平, 柞磨 佑紀, 梅村 啓太郎, 栗田 喜久, 鬼倉 徳雄 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,820,130
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,446
of 449,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.