↓ Skip to main content

Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri‐implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Implants Research, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri‐implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review
Published in
Clinical Oral Implants Research, February 2023
DOI 10.1111/clr.14029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Monje, Andrea Roccuzzo, Daniel Buser, Hom‐Lay Wang

Abstract

The significance on the association between the peri-implant bucco-lingual dimension (BLD) at the stage of implant placement and the occurrence of biological and aesthetic complications is yet unknown. Systematic screening of electronic sources was carried out to identify clinical and preclinical studies reporting on the baseline BLD and/or buccal bone thickness (BBT) values. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of simultaneous grafting at sites with deficient or no buccal bone wall (BBW) at baseline. The primary outcome variables were BBT, BLD and vertical bone loss (VBL) at re-evaluation. Moreover, radiographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated. Overall, 12 clinical and 4 preclinical studies met the inclusion criteria. The clinical evidence demonstrated that during healing, dimensional changes occur in the alveolar bone and in the BBW that may compromise the integrity of bone around a dental implant. The preclinical evidence validated the fact that implants placed in the presence of thin BBW are more prone to exhibit major dimensional changes. Moreover, the clinical and preclinical data supported that in scenarios where dehiscence-type defects are left for spontaneous healing, greater VBL and mucosal recession (MR) together with the occurrence of biologic complications are expected. Furthermore, the augmentation of dehiscence-type defects is associated with hard and soft tissue stability. Dimensional changes occur as a result of implant placement in healed ridges that may lead to VBL and MR. Thin BBW (≲2mm) are prone to exhibit major post-changes that may compromise the integrity of the buccal bone, biologic and esthetic complications.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 26 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,889,670
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#992
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,488
of 423,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.