The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A compendious review on the influence of e-waste aggregates on the properties of concrete
|
---|---|
Published in |
Case Studies in Construction Materials, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01740 |
Authors |
Aamar Danish, Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah, Togay Ozbakkaloglu, Muhammad Usama Salim, Kiran Khurshid, Muhammed Bayram, Mugahed Amran, Roman Fediuk, Diyar N. Qader |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 48 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 24 | 29% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 45 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,954,462
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Case Studies in Construction Materials
#38
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,551
of 9,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Case Studies in Construction Materials
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.