The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Influence of Oil-Based Ink Containing Xylene for Plastic Containers Used in Making Infusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences), January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.5649/jjphcs.29.203 |
| Authors |
Masayoshi Koinuma, Makoto Senoo, Tomonaga Takase, Mitsuyo Nishizawa, Masaaki Hirano, Hidetoshi Arakawa, Shoko Maeda |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#60
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,154
of 136,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them