↓ Skip to main content

The structural discrepancy between the small and large gut microbiota of Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) during hibernation

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The structural discrepancy between the small and large gut microbiota of Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) during hibernation
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/s12223-023-01031-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaowei Song, Yuanyuan Zhai, Jinghan Song, Jingwei Zhang, Xiangzhen Li

Abstract

Hibernating amphibians are suitable for the research on the adaptation of gut microbiota to long-term fasting and cold stresses. However, the previous studies mainly focus on the large or whole gut microbiota but not the small gut microbiota. To test the structural discrepancy between the small and large gut microbiota during hibernation, we performed two independent batches of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to profile the small and large gut microbiota of hibernating Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) from two wild populations. Both batches of data revealed that Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were the three most dominant phyla in the small and large gut microbiota. Three core OTUs with 100% occurrence in all gut microbiotas were annotated as Pseudomonas. A significant structural discrepancy was detected between the small and large gut microbiota. For instance, Proteobacteria assembled in the small intestine with a higher proportion than it did in the large intestine, but Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes assembled in the large intestine with a higher proportion than they did in the small intestine. The large gut microbiota exhibited higher diversity than the small gut microbiota. Nevertheless, a severe batch effect existed in the structural analysis of the gut microbiotas. The large gut microbiota showed a better resistance to the batch effect than the small gut microbiota did. This study provides preliminary evidence that microbes assemble in the small and large intestines of amphibians with discrepant patterns during hibernation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,641,219
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#392
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,513
of 434,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.