The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The battle of crops against drought: Genetic dissection and improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jipb.13451 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhirui Yang, Feng Qin |
| Abstract |
With ongoing global climate change, water scarcity-induced drought stress remains a major threat to agricultural productivity. Plants undergo a series of physiological and morphological changes to cope with drought stress, including stomatal closure to reduce transpiration and changes in root architecture to optimize water uptake. Combined phenotypic and multi-omics studies have recently identified a number of drought-related genetic resources in different crop species. The functional dissection of these genes using molecular techniques has enriched our understanding of drought responses in crops and has provided genetic targets for enhancing resistance to drought. Here, we review recent advances in the cloning and functional analysis of drought resistance genes and the development of technologies to mitigate the threat of drought to crop production. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 67% |
| Scientists | 15 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,353,646
of 26,554,122 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
#21
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,634
of 510,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
#4
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,554,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.