↓ Skip to main content

酒井泰弘著『ケインズ対フランク・ナイト─経済学の巨人は「不確実性の時代」をどう捉えたのか』ミネルヴァ書房 2015年10月15日 344ページ

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Regional Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
酒井泰弘著『ケインズ対フランク・ナイト─経済学の巨人は「不確実性の時代」をどう捉えたのか』ミネルヴァ書房 2015年10月15日 344ページ
Published in
Studies in Regional Science, January 2016
DOI 10.2457/srs.46.243
Authors

浅田 統一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Regional Science
#36
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,044
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Regional Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them