↓ Skip to main content

鹿児島県甑島列島近海から得られた国内2例目のオオソコアマダイ(アカタチ科)

Overview of attention for article published in Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鹿児島県甑島列島近海から得られた国内2例目のオオソコアマダイ(アカタチ科)
Published in
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, May 2021
DOI 10.34583/ichthy.8.0_15
Authors

中村 潤平, 本村 浩之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#47
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,786
of 459,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.