↓ Skip to main content

Decision making processes based on social conventional rules in early adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision making processes based on social conventional rules in early adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep37875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidetsugu Komeda, Hidekazu Osanai, Kaichi Yanaoka, Yuko Okamoto, Toru Fujioka, Sumiyoshi Arai, Keisuke Inohara, Masuo Koyasu, Takashi Kusumi, Shinichiro Takiguchi, Masao Kawatani, Hirokazu Kumazaki, Michio Hiratani, Akemi Tomoda, Hirotaka Kosaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Linguistics 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,982,614
of 26,448,463 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,249
of 146,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,873
of 422,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#461
of 3,445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,448,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.