↓ Skip to main content

Early-Stage Primary Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Multi-Institution Experience

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
53 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early-Stage Primary Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Multi-Institution Experience
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, January 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel E Oliver, Jose M Laborde, Deepinder P Singh, Michael T Milano, Gregory M Videtic, Graeme R Williams, Michael J LaRiviere, Jason W Chan, Gabrielle W Peters, Roy H Decker, Pamela Samson, Clifford G Robinson, William G Breen, Dawn Owen, Sibo Tian, Kristin A Higgins, Doaa Almeldin, Salma K Jabbour, Fen Wang, G Daniel Grass, Bradford A Perez, Thomas J Dilling, Jonathan Strosberg, Stephen A Rosenberg

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 256. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#154,274
of 26,587,829 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#71
of 11,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,055
of 494,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#3
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.