↓ Skip to main content

GPRC5D CAR T cells (OriCAR-017) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS): a first-in-human, single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Haematology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GPRC5D CAR T cells (OriCAR-017) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS): a first-in-human, single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial
Published in
The Lancet Haematology, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00372-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mingming Zhang, Guoqing Wei, Linghui Zhou, Jincai Zhou, Siye Chen, Wei Zhang, Dongrui Wang, Xueping Luo, Jiazhen Cui, Simao Huang, Shan Fu, Xinkai Zhou, Yu Tang, Xiaomin Ding, Jiao Kuang, Xiaowen Peter He, Yongxian Hu, He Huang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 29 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 31 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#93,728
of 26,779,733 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#16
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,447
of 494,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,779,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.