The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 799 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christiana Westlin, Jordan E Theriault, Yuta Katsumi, Alfonso Nieto-Castanon, Aaron Kucyi, Sebastian F Ruf, Sarah M Brown, Misha Pavel, Deniz Erdogmus, Dana H Brooks, Karen S Quigley, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Lisa Feldman Barrett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 3% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| Denmark | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 6 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Turkey | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 41 | 5% |
| Unknown | 625 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 460 | 58% |
| Scientists | 294 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 211 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 49 | 23% |
| Psychology | 37 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 434. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#70,261
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#28
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,888
of 492,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.