↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating spillovers and cost-effectiveness of complementary agricultural and social protection interventions: evidence from Lesotho

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Development Effectiveness, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 300)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating spillovers and cost-effectiveness of complementary agricultural and social protection interventions: evidence from Lesotho
Published in
Journal of Development Effectiveness, January 2023
DOI 10.1080/19439342.2022.2162562
Authors

Silvio Daidone, Justin Kagin, Noemi Pace, Ervin Prifti, J.Edward Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 17%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 9 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#876,476
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Development Effectiveness
#9
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,506
of 491,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Development Effectiveness
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them