The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamics and risk sharing in groups of selfish individuals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Theoretical Biology, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111433 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Samuel Monter, Veit-Lorenz Heuthe, Emanuele Panizon, Clemens Bechinger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Japan | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 1 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Psychology | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#586,690
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#44
of 4,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,359
of 481,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.