The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
博物館におけるコレクション情報の組織化:情報標準と東京国立博物館の事例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1241/johokanri.59.577 |
| Authors |
村田 良二 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,241,668
of 26,527,568 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#62
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,157
of 422,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,527,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.