The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.81182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiba Dagher, Anne-Marie Chaftari, Ishwaria M Subbiah, Alexandre E Malek, Ying Jiang, Peter Lamie, Bruno Granwehr, Teny John, Eduardo Yepez, Jovan Borjan, Cielito Reyes-Gibby, Mary Flores, Fareed Khawaja, Mala Pande, Noman Ali, Raniv Rojo, Daniel D Karp, Patrick Chaftari, Ray Hachem, Issam I Raad |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Scientists | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 504. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2024.
All research outputs
#54,905
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#116
of 16,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,535
of 494,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#2
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.