The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
チーズや生ハムの頻回摂食歴がある壮年男性に発症したListeria monocytogenes髄膜炎の1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.96.91 |
| Authors |
Takayuki YOSHIOKA, Teruki SHIN, Hitoshi KOORIYAMA, Tatsuya ISHII, Yoshisuke HARUNA, Hiroyuki MATAKI |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#310
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,664
of 446,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.