The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Failure 3-year after Shunt Surgery Caused by Migration of Detached Ventricular Catheter into the Cranium: A Case Study of Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus
|
---|---|
Published in |
NMC Case Report Journal, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0162 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kazuo Kakinuma, Keisuke Morihara, Yoshiteru Shimoda, Nobuko Kawakami, Shigenori Kanno, Mayuko Otomo, Teiji Tominaga, Kyoko Suzuki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,929,728
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from NMC Case Report Journal
#26
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,003
of 473,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NMC Case Report Journal
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.