The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Density dependence, whitebark pine, and vital rates of grizzly bears
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.1005 |
Authors |
Frank T. van Manen, Mark A. Haroldson, Daniel D. Bjornlie, Michael R. Ebinger, Daniel J. Thompson, Cecily M. Costello, Gary C. White |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
Researcher | 14 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,095,869
of 24,294,745 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#926
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,553
of 288,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.