The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
地域高齢者を対象とした要介護予防のための包括的健診(「お達者健診」)についての研究 1. 受診者と非受診者の特性について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.11236/jph.50.1_39 |
| Authors |
鈴木 隆雄, 岩佐 一, 吉田 英世, 金 憲経, 新名 正弥, 胡 秀英, 新開 省二, 熊谷 修, 藤原 佳典, 吉田 祐子, 古名 丈人, 杉浦 美穂, 西澤 哲, 渡辺 修一郎, 湯川 晴美 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#228
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,137
of 370,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.