The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The stability of sulfate and hydrated sulfate minerals near ambient conditions and their significance in environmental and planetary sciences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.11.027 |
Authors |
I-Ming Chou, Robert R. Seal, Alian Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
#177
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,366
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.