The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cyclic biogeochemical processes and nitrogen fate beneath a subtropical stormwater infiltration basin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.03.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M. O'Reilly, Ni-Bin Chang, Martin P. Wanielista |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Engineering | 11 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
#111
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,698
of 173,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.