The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms for chemostatic behavior in catchments: Implications for CO2 consumption by mineral weathering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.09.014 |
| Authors |
David W. Clow, M. Alisa Mast |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 24% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 64 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,509
of 26,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,377
of 176,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#233
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.