You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of regression‐based models to map sensitivity of aquatic resources to atmospheric deposition in Yosemite National Park, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2009wr008316 |
| Authors |
David W. Clow, Leora Nanus, Brian Huggett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 39% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 32% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#2,066
of 5,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,983
of 108,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.