The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fault-related clay authigenesis along the Moab Fault: Implications for calculations of fault rock composition and mechanical and hydrologic fault zone properties
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Structural Geology, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jsg.2010.07.009 |
Authors |
John G. Solum, Nicholas C. Davatzes, David A. Lockner |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Latvia | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 29% |
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 62 | 79% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural Geology
#233
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,626
of 190,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural Geology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them