↓ Skip to main content

Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2009
DOI 10.1890/08-0255.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Martin, Michael C. Runge, James D. Nichols, Bruce C. Lubow, William L. Kendall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 4%
Brazil 5 1%
Australia 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 394 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 126 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 21%
Student > Master 59 13%
Other 32 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 38 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 40%
Environmental Science 142 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 1%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 59 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,367
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,066
of 126,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.