↓ Skip to main content

SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein induces TLR4-mediated long-term cognitive dysfunction recapitulating post-COVID-19 syndrome in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 13,719)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1146 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein induces TLR4-mediated long-term cognitive dysfunction recapitulating post-COVID-19 syndrome in mice
Published in
Cell Reports, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabricia L Fontes-Dantas, Gabriel G Fernandes, Elisa G Gutman, Emanuelle V De Lima, Leticia S Antonio, Mariana B Hammerle, Hannah P Mota-Araujo, Lilian C Colodeti, Suzana M B Araújo, Gabrielle M Froz, Talita N da Silva, Larissa A Duarte, Andreza L Salvio, Karina L Pires, Luciane A A Leon, Claudia Cristina F Vasconcelos, Luciana Romão, Luiz Eduardo B Savio, Jerson L Silva, Robson da Costa, Julia R Clarke, Andrea T Da Poian, Soniza V Alves-Leon, Giselle F Passos, Claudia P Figueiredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 39 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 11%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 766. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#27,339
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#26
of 13,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#793
of 437,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#1
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.