The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multiple-method estimation of recharge rates at diverse locations in the North Carolina Coastal Plain, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10040-006-0123-3 |
Authors |
A. L. Coes, T. B. Spruill, M. J. Thomasson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Slovakia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 24% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 47% |
Engineering | 11 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#220
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,382
of 160,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them